My first attempt at re-amping a pedal without mic’ing, just using the Dwarf. I did some manual aligning because there was a brief latency/difference on the signals.
If useful, I can do different trainings and different settings.
ESR was my lowest ever.
Strymon Riverside HIGH GAIN
presence setting on the back: middle setting
In an effort to get the same delay on both tracks, I looped the input signal to the output and an input again, so the path of both signals is just as much delayed.
Can you make light breakup setting with mid on and off? I had riverside and it sounds really good! Curently I switched to Kernom Ridge, IMO it is more flexible and offcourse has different sounds than riverside.
Indeed, I was thinking as well, I can imagine that the latency for this kind of setup can be predicted (and countered with a “latency plugin”?
How accurate is that? How can the script know where, in this kind of shape, where the beginning of the little tick is in the target signal? Here I manually aligned it
@LievenDV sticking to the real name can violate trademarks. We want to avoid that completely in plugin names and artwork on our platform.
However even with registered trademarks, it’s allowed to use them in a descriptive way. So if an original piece of hardware is being used, it can be called by its name in the plugin description. To further avoid confusion, adding a disclaimer like this is recommended:
Product names and trademarks are the property of their respective holders that do not endorse and are not associated or affiliated with MOD Audio or [Plugin Author], they were used merely to identify the product whose sound was incorporated in the creation of this plugin.
So, let’s say I call this the “Coastal Drive” overdrive and I say that is was created by modelling a Strymon Riverside and I add the disclaimer. The colors+texture are a hint but the font is different, there is a free of use image and the name is “faraway” hint.
It’s not hard but even though I’m following the same steps, it still is hit and miss for me
graphics look really great and I like the approach. Have a visual guide for what it is.
This could be easily a web template where you could mix and match fonts and graphics with some colors.
Load that from the .json and have it centralized.
Yeah let me think how we can manage that. We already have a sharing category. Perhaps a sticky thread on top of that?
People that have created model could contact me to decide on a pseudo name name and I make a fun “avatar” to go with it, some standard format to go with it (name, type, which training models, tips on use etc)
Do you still need help with profiling? It isn’t that hard it follow the guide on the page itself.
There is updated documentation on its way I’ve heard!
