Dear MOD users
I would like to thank all those who filled out the survey. We received a total of 543 responses showing a very high engagement.
First and foremost, I would like to applaud the respect and understanding of the users. Only three respondents made use of the F-word in the open fields, which is remarkable in such a dire situation. Getting the amount of hate I am currently getting, it is refreshing to see a small number of disrespectful comments. I thank you guys immensely.
The results of the survey bring valuable insights regarding the future of MOD, from the relationship with customers to the possible additional revenues it might have.
The most important conclusions we have are:
1 - MOD should act as a business as the majority of the users want to be in a buyer-seller relationship.
If we remain in the hardware business, there is not even questioning about this. Hardware is capital intensive and requires a network of business relationships (the supply chain).
2 - Open Source
88.4% of the respondents consider that the importance of releasing the code as open source ranges from medium to high.
Furthermore, there is a meaningful amount of Raspberry Pi owners:
There is a meaningful conflict between the wish for open source and the business orientation of the company and we will tackle this conflict in an open way.
3 - Community engagement and contribution
There is a high percentage of users willing to contribute, either for plugin development or pedalboard creation. Both efforts though would be made in a community goodwill mindset.
4 - Referrals and involvement of users in the sales
There is a willingness to use referrals, both actively and casually.
5 - Possible additional revenue sources
There is a meaningful perception of value and willingness to pay for:
- Specially crafted pedalboard collections
- Releases of System updates
- High-quality plugins
Furthermore, there is an openness to payment of subscriptions for one or more of the above items. There is, although, a concern about the use of such subscription systems and we need to further investigate the sense it would make for our business. Given the user base size, it would not make sense to have a subscription while we do not reach critical mass for that.
End of survey results
—----------------—----------------—----------------—----------------—----------------—----------------
What now?
The assets are all frozen in the insolvency estate, preventing us from making any decision about the codebase. If we or someone else purchases the assets from the insolvency estate, they can then be released as wished. If the assets are not purchased until the company is finally liquidated, the immaterial assets are handed over to me (as a founder and general manager). This process can take more than a year.
Although many have manifested interesting visions for the future here, including software-only models, none of this works without funding. As some have correctly pointed out, any new development will require considerable time without revenue and that is a luxury we do not have. Furthermore, there is no evidence that such a software-only model could turn into a healthy business.
On the other hand, there is the existing hardware-based business model with many proof points that has not yet fully fallen apart and has a chance of success. Production of the Dwarf is in place, we have a working and operational ecosystem, we have sales channels in place and we have a number of “low hanging fruits” in terms of improvements we can do using what we have in our hands.
That said, we are drawing a timeline for either:
- Reboot the hardware-based business, giving continuity to the production and sales of Dwarf units and providing a path to deliver the crowdfunded units.
or
- Hibernate and search for another business model aiming at a refounding. In this case, the hardware business cannot be continued. We would try to secure the IP assets and work with the community to provide a minimum level of operation for current device owners.
Reboot - Last attempt
At our initial announcement of the insolvency and the reboot plan, we created a medium-term plan to bring the business back to operation with some key changes:
- Focus on Dwarf
- Improvement of pedalboard offerings (Killer Apps model)
- Creation of services for device owners like the AI pedalboard assistant.
- Focus on a few big B2B customers
The survey and also the inputs we have received here in the forum show that many adjustments can be made to our longer-term plans, but the reality is that if we want to reboot, we need to act with what we have currently at our disposal.
Since the only way to have a perspective of delivering the crowdfunding units relies on the survival of the hardware-based business, we have created a new budget of 200k€ by further cutting down costs to a very minimum in order to secure survival and make time for further fundraising.
Contrary to the previous 300k€ budget, in this new one, we wouldn’t accommodate the shipping of the crowdfunding units. We continue carrying the moral obligation to deliver the units to backers, but we can only produce and ship them after raising more funds. But, on the other hand, we can offer a way for backers to receive their units by paying an additional amount of 150€ to receive their units. With this payment, the total unit cost for backers remains below the current Thomann retail price. This 150€ would be paid back in the form of plugin coupons.
I know that this is not the desired outcome, but, among the possible options, this is the one in which there is perspective. Flunking the company will make any delivery perspective go away.
To summarize, in this second reboot attempt we are:
- Considering the leanest possible structure
- Delivering additional value in the form of pedalboards
- Delivering crowdfunding units against a voucher purchase
- Preparing for higher financing
Currently, we have 120k€ from private investors that continue to be committed.
An additional 24k€ were committed by community members. We have 48 respondents to the survey that manifested a business interest.
I would like to try this last funding sprint until September 15th and collect the commitments for the remaining 56k€
If we cannot commit to proceeding with the reboot until then, we will be forced to proceed with the hibernation option.
If you would like to receive information on participating in this funding sprint as an investor, please fill out this form:
Click here and fill out the form if you consider investing
This is the same form I have previously shared. If you have already filed it, please don’t do it again. I am sending via email the updated information on this fundraising sprint.
The sum of commitments will be displayed in the dashboard at the link below:
I am happy to hear your comments and I am available for any questions regarding this reboot attempt or the hibernation.
Best regards
Gianfranco - The MODFather