Thanks for your work @MikeOliphant !
Keep it rocking! Maybe with a little more optimization we will reach the next size nam models 
I couldnāt test Aida-X models in your plugin, as it is not showing any Aida-X model in the list. Probably mod-ui only expects one type of file for each plugin, but I had not look in detailā¦ at the moment Iām just happy with nam models.
You may be able to get it to work by adding āaidadspmodelā to āmod:fileTypesā in āneural_amp_modeler.ttl.inā.
Thanks for the tip. Yes, Aida-X works indeed and there is a little CPU improvement, around 5% less.
@fer You might want to check out the latest version of the lv2 repo - you may see significant performance gains for both NAM and Aida models on the Dwarf.
Thanks again @MikeOliphant!
I tried in my Dwarf and there is some performance improvement, but not much since your last version using RTNeural. Now Nano NAM models shows around 39% CPU and Feather around 69%. But still not possible to load Lite or Standard models.
It is all very architecture-specific. For example, the RTNeural implementation worked well on x64, but did not do well at all on my Raspberry Pi 4. I would have thought the Dwarf would be more similar to the Pi, but 
You may be able to get a bit more performance if you grab the latest version of the repo and add ā-DWAVENET_FRAMES=128ā to your CMake commandline. Or it could be worseā¦
yes it did improve a little more 
ā¦ now nano 36% and Feather 66% with my Dwarf at 128 frames.
How can we find the nano captures? in the link in this thread its sending me to the tonehunt website. I assumed they changed the website and now it just show the home. I could not find the option #nano-mdl in the search filters.
I see, the the ānanoā is in the actual name of the capture (not in an specific tag). Thanks!
nano-mdl is the tag though. part of the ātechnicalā details of the model